Love, notice, together with inhibition off view out-of close choices

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you can Individual Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot off connection inside the peoples mating. Summary of General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Sites paradox revisited. Journal off Social Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social tech one to decrease societal involvement and mental really-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.M., & Fields, J. M. (2001). Matter, time, and lifetime of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Newest Inhabitants Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies from intimacy, interests, and you will connection: Assessment the fresh assumptions of one’s triangular concept away from like. Mental Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception best regarding starting worse: Societal reviews contained in this romantic relationships. Diary out-of Personality and you will Societal Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: This new implicit knowledge from personal rivalry. Log of Personality and you may Societal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

Good. (2001)mitment and you can matchmaking repairs mechanisms

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can attractive choice: This new changed mindset regarding relationships maintenance. Advancement and Person Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential data regarding dispute and you will accord from inside the troubled and you may nondistressed relationship lovers. Diary off Consulting and you will Clinical Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.

mГёde Ecuadoriansk kvinder

McKenna, K. Y. A., Environmentally friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationships creation on line: What is the larger attraction? Log out-of Personal Situations, 58(1), 9–31.

The benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization while the construction from pleasure into the romantic relationships

Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-assessment intentions during the personal relationship: A type of international enhancement and you will particular verification. For the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents about study of partners communication (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-therapist bond through the contact lens from accessory principle. Psychotherapy: Concept, Lookup, Routine, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest public keeping track of system: Enhanced sensitivity to help you societal cues since the a transformative response to social exception. Inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new social outcast: Ostracism, personal different, rejection, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Drive.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Worldwide and you may particular relational patterns in the exposure to public affairs. Journal out of Identification and you can Social Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Connection and you will information seeking in romantic dating. Character and you may Public Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may specific connection representations inside adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Log Out-of Public And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Within the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate personal matchmaking: Fix and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection yourself impact one of partners since the a function of new resemblance inside their mutual enjoy. Character And you will Personal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Effects of salience out-of extrinsic perks toward liking and you can enjoying. Journal regarding Identity and you may Personal Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.