A different sort of piece of issues asking whether feminine was in fact always HPV

This new questionnaire contains 3 pieces. Region We provided inquiries regarding socio-demographic study (decades, number of education, parity, familial earnings, job, newest marital status, sexual passion, reputation for HPV inoculation, and you will history of unusual cervical cancer testing).

Part II comprised of 6 questions about the mark ladies who will likely be screened, many years to begin with, frequency, decades or requirements to quit out of assessment, and methods out-of evaluation. Just the professionals who had have you ever heard from HPV carry out go-ahead so you can Region III and that assessed understanding of HPV out of their kind of (oncogenic otherwise low-oncogenic), mode regarding alert and you will prevention.

Before the study, the newest questionnaire regarding part II and you can area III into the Thai adaptation was indeed contemplated, talked about, and you can revised up until consensus one of 20 boffins who were every gynecologic oncologists (certain was basically experts in other synchronous training). The experts rated each one of 19 questions once the both ‘relevant’ or ‘not relevant’. The item-top Posts Validity List (I-CVI) was determined for every item, additionally the Stuff Validity Directory (CVI) are determined by taking the common ratio away from 14 questions relating to information about cervical disease evaluating and you can 5 questions about HPV. The latest CVI was basically step 1 for both components of this new questionnaire (S1 Dining table). The fresh new precision was checked during the 30 feminine with the same attribute given that people. New Cronbach’ alpha coefficients on precision was basically 0.819 to possess information about cervical cancer examination and you will 0.907 having information about HPV.

Study range

For the go out off scheduled colposcopy, the study assistant provided information of study for the female just who found inclusion standards. The ladies which accessible to engage offered authored advised agree and you may answered the brand new questionnaire individually on their own ahead of continuing to help you colposcopy.

Analysis accumulated because of it studies was indeed socio-group data (Region I of the questionnaire), experience with cervical malignant tumors evaluating (Area II), and expertise in HPV (Part III).

Statistical research

The new answers of knowledge on cervical disease tests and you will HPV was basically assessed because of the for every goods just before rating categorization. Best respond to try obtained once the 1 while ‘wrong and you can not knowing answer’ is actually obtained 0.

Out of 14 concerns of cervical disease examination, feminine whose rating was ? 10 had been randomly classified due to the fact which have ‘an excellent knowledge’ if not was thought to be having “not-good studies”. For expertise in HPV, women whoever respond to is actually ‘never ever observed HPV’ had been excluded on the analysis from HPV training.

Of 5 issues, women whose score had been ? step three was in fact regarded as with ‘a experience in HPV’ normally just like the ‘bad knowledge’. Out-of 19 concerns, women whose score was indeed ? thirteen was indeed categorized as the that have ‘a overall knowledge’ usually since ‘not good complete knowledge’.

The data was hvad Jordansk kvinder vil have in fact accumulated inside an electronic databases and examined having fun with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Detailed analytics were utilized to research market research and you can was summarized because the quantity with percentage, suggest that have practical departure or median having range. This new connection between each variable and you may degree get were assessed having fun with effortless linear regression. Exploratory design was developed in multivariable analysis in addition to every variables possibly pertaining to the knowledge score. The latest sensed level of statistical relevance was an excellent p-value of 0.05 otherwise smaller.


Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged